The Demopædia Encyclopedia on Population is under heavy modernization and maintenance. Outputs could look bizarre, sorry for the temporary inconvenience

Multilingual Demographic Dictionary, second unified edition, English volume

Difference between revisions of "Talk:20"

Multilingual Demographic Dictionary, second unified edition, English vol.
Jump to: navigation, search
(201: Integrating the note 9 into a newtextterm "population movement")
(Page double checked)
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<!--'''Talk:20'''-->
 
<!--'''Talk:20'''-->
{{To be checked}}
+
{{double checked}}
 +
 
 +
== 201-11 (Double checked) ==
  
 
* {{translated German term|20|201|201-11|GermanNewTextTerm=räumliche Bevölkerungsbewegung}}
 
* {{translated German term|20|201|201-11|GermanNewTextTerm=räumliche Bevölkerungsbewegung}}
Line 6: Line 8:
  
 
* {{missing French term|20|202|202-8|FrenchTextTerm=vérification post-censitaire}}
 
* {{missing French term|20|202|202-8|FrenchTextTerm=vérification post-censitaire}}
:*<b>vérification post-censitaire</b> <sup>8 </sup>par <b>enquête de vérification du recensement </b><sup>9</sup> in French and <b>post-enumeration survey</b> <sup>9 </sup>is taken after a census to verify the accuracy and completeness of enumeration. in English)
+
:*<b>vérification post-censitaire</b> <sup>8 </sup>par <b>enquête de vérification du recensement </b><sup>9</sup> in French  
 +
: Original: A {{TextTerm|post-enumeration survey|9|202|OtherIndexEntry=survey, post-enumeration}} is taken after a census to verify the accuracy and completeness of enumeration.
 +
: Proposition: To verify the accuracy and completeness of enumeration ({{RefNumber|23|0|2}}), a {{NewTextTerm|post-enumeration check|8|202|9|OtherIndexEntry=check, post-enumeration}} is performed using a {{TextTerm|post-enumeration survey|9|202|OtherIndexEntry=survey, post-enumeration}}.--[[User:Nicolas Brouard|Nicolas Brouard]] 09:32, 2 July 2013 (CEST)
 +
:: No remark form Stan Becker and Patrick Heuveline. Double checked. --[[User:Nicolas Brouard|Nicolas Brouard]] ([[User talk:Nicolas Brouard|talk]]) 17:32, 28 December 2017 (CET)
 +
 
 +
== 202-7 (double-checked) ==
 +
 
 +
* 202-7 It is 'pretest' (done). Also some survey folks distinguish pretests from pilot tests.  I forget which is which but one is for the questionnaire testing and one tests all the survey procedures (e.g. supervision, checking, even data entry....).  I could ask DHS if you wish to make the distinction. --[[User:Stan BECKER|Stan BECKER]] 16:03, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
 +
: pre-test was first used by Eugen Grebenik in the first 'English' edition.--[[User:Nicolas Brouard|Nicolas Brouard]] 16:22, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
 +
 
 +
* present tense 'include' seems better. (done).--[[User:Stan BECKER|Stan BECKER]] 16:09, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
 +
: double-checked[[User:Patrick HEUVELINE|Patrick HEUVELINE]] ([[User talk:Patrick HEUVELINE|talk]]) 17:53, 18 July 2017 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
== 203-8 (double-checked) ==
 +
 
 +
* 203-8 Maybe we need to add here computer assisted interviewing (CASI) and phone interviews, etc?--[[User:Stan BECKER|Stan BECKER]] 16:11, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
 +
: True, but this is a fast evolving field (CASI, phone interviews, internet samples, etc...). I think we're better off, in the interest of time, sticking with what needs correction. Suggest no change. [[User:Patrick HEUVELINE|Patrick HEUVELINE]] ([[User talk:Patrick HEUVELINE|talk]]) 17:56, 18 July 2017 (CEST)
 +
:: I agree too. Double checked. --[[User:Nicolas Brouard|Nicolas Brouard]] ([[User talk:Nicolas Brouard|talk]]) 17:30, 28 December 2017 (CET)
 +
 
 +
== 204-4 (double-checked)==
 +
 
 +
* This seems unduly 'Northern' country oriented. Most countries have a National Statistical Office which is responsible I believe.  Doubtful that we need to focus on UK and USA. --[[User:Stan BECKER|Stan BECKER]] 16:16, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
 +
: There was a closing bracket which hided some other National Statistical Offices: ''; in England and Wales it is the General Register Office, in Scotland the General Registry Office; both are headed by a Registrar General.'' . But still 'Northern country oriented, I agree.--[[User:Nicolas Brouard|Nicolas Brouard]] 16:21, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
 +
:: I agree but again, in the interest of time, I suggest to focus on correcting errors rather than trying to improve the text. Suggest no change. [[User:Patrick HEUVELINE|Patrick HEUVELINE]] ([[User talk:Patrick HEUVELINE|talk]]) 17:58, 18 July 2017 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
== 205-8 (Double checked) ==
 +
 
 +
* Order is strange here. I would switch last 2 sentences as refusal of whole interview is very different from refusal of a particular question.--[[User:Stan BECKER|Stan BECKER]] 16:28, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
 +
: Agree with Stan's suggestion, modification made[[User:Patrick HEUVELINE|Patrick HEUVELINE]] ([[User talk:Patrick HEUVELINE|talk]]) 11:05, 20 July 2017 (CEST)
 +
 
 +
== 207-1 (double checked) ==
 +
 
 +
* I have never heard of an individual schedule for a census. It has always been a  household schedule with listing of individuals.  Maybe women of repro age are given a schedule in some censuses???--[[User:Stan BECKER|Stan BECKER]] 16:31, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
 +
: I don't know either, someone with census experience should finalize. [[User:Patrick HEUVELINE|Patrick HEUVELINE]] ([[User talk:Patrick HEUVELINE|talk]]) 11:10, 20 July 2017 (CEST)
 +
: Stan Becker agrees that if it was already in the first edition, as in many other languages, we keep it:--[[User:Nicolas Brouard|Nicolas Brouard]] ([[User talk:Nicolas Brouard|talk]]) 03:28, 27 April 2018 (CEST)--[[User:Nicolas Brouard|Nicolas Brouard]] ([[User talk:Nicolas Brouard|talk]]) 03:28, 27 April 2018 (CEST)

Latest revision as of 02:28, 27 April 2018




201-11 (Double checked)

The term population movement 11★ is used to refer to the geographical movement of a population.--Nicolas Brouard 09:09, 2 July 2013 (CEST)
Original: A post-enumeration survey 9 is taken after a census to verify the accuracy and completeness of enumeration.
Proposition: To verify the accuracy and completeness of enumeration (230-2), a post-enumeration check 8★ is performed using a post-enumeration survey 9.--Nicolas Brouard 09:32, 2 July 2013 (CEST)
No remark form Stan Becker and Patrick Heuveline. Double checked. --Nicolas Brouard (talk) 17:32, 28 December 2017 (CET)

202-7 (double-checked)

  • 202-7 It is 'pretest' (done). Also some survey folks distinguish pretests from pilot tests. I forget which is which but one is for the questionnaire testing and one tests all the survey procedures (e.g. supervision, checking, even data entry....). I could ask DHS if you wish to make the distinction. --Stan BECKER 16:03, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
pre-test was first used by Eugen Grebenik in the first 'English' edition.--Nicolas Brouard 16:22, 29 September 2014 (CEST)


  • present tense 'include' seems better. (done).--Stan BECKER 16:09, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
double-checkedPatrick HEUVELINE (talk) 17:53, 18 July 2017 (CEST)

203-8 (double-checked)

  • 203-8 Maybe we need to add here computer assisted interviewing (CASI) and phone interviews, etc?--Stan BECKER 16:11, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
True, but this is a fast evolving field (CASI, phone interviews, internet samples, etc...). I think we're better off, in the interest of time, sticking with what needs correction. Suggest no change. Patrick HEUVELINE (talk) 17:56, 18 July 2017 (CEST)
I agree too. Double checked. --Nicolas Brouard (talk) 17:30, 28 December 2017 (CET)

204-4 (double-checked)

  • This seems unduly 'Northern' country oriented. Most countries have a National Statistical Office which is responsible I believe. Doubtful that we need to focus on UK and USA. --Stan BECKER 16:16, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
There was a closing bracket which hided some other National Statistical Offices: ; in England and Wales it is the General Register Office, in Scotland the General Registry Office; both are headed by a Registrar General. . But still 'Northern country oriented, I agree.--Nicolas Brouard 16:21, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
I agree but again, in the interest of time, I suggest to focus on correcting errors rather than trying to improve the text. Suggest no change. Patrick HEUVELINE (talk) 17:58, 18 July 2017 (CEST)

205-8 (Double checked)

  • Order is strange here. I would switch last 2 sentences as refusal of whole interview is very different from refusal of a particular question.--Stan BECKER 16:28, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
Agree with Stan's suggestion, modification madePatrick HEUVELINE (talk) 11:05, 20 July 2017 (CEST)

207-1 (double checked)

  • I have never heard of an individual schedule for a census. It has always been a household schedule with listing of individuals. Maybe women of repro age are given a schedule in some censuses???--Stan BECKER 16:31, 29 September 2014 (CEST)
I don't know either, someone with census experience should finalize. Patrick HEUVELINE (talk) 11:10, 20 July 2017 (CEST)
Stan Becker agrees that if it was already in the first edition, as in many other languages, we keep it:--Nicolas Brouard (talk) 03:28, 27 April 2018 (CEST)--Nicolas Brouard (talk) 03:28, 27 April 2018 (CEST)